There used to be a 'Sticky' on the subject of K3015 suggesting, as I recall, that the matter was under discussion by the Committee? Does its absence suggest a resolution of the matter? In the immortal words of Private Eye, I think we should be told.
As well as the important issue of rectifying the misscarriage I believe that the facts and information available in the original post should also remain openly available on here until the matter is resolved.
I have also been waiting for some unfreezing of this situation and have been somewhat disappointed that the issue seems to have been kicked into touch.
OK - I'll bite. If it was swept under the carpet, then I & others wasted many hours, or even days, of our lives. Whilst some love kicking a dead horse; not one shred of actual evidence was presented to the committee to suggest that the car is not what we record it as. Your very fed up Chairman......
No shred of evidence was submitted / revealed by the committee (other than copy minutes showing it was one man's word) to support what you record it as Jeremy! And my suggested solution was not supported by the committee. Consequently this unsatisfactory issue will inevitably run on..
Forum Locked
Topic Locked
Posted - 22/01/2022 : 10:07:01
